Showing posts with label Josiah "Jed" Bartlet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Josiah "Jed" Bartlet. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2012

HOPE!

As always, when things heated up, Barack Obama remained cool.
And now he's making his way to the Rushmore Four after defeating Jed Bartlet in our toughest fight yet.

Obama vs. Bartlet
Barack Obama701 (53.9%)
Josiah "Jed" Bartlet     600 (46.1%)

We'd have to say, there's a strange feeling in the HttCttD Offices this week. We can't help but think that there may have been some voting irregularities on both sides. However, since there's no way of proving anything, we'll have to accept the possibility that we had over 1,300 legitimate voters this week.

If that's the case, then we welcome our new voters, over 1,250 of you! There is nothing absolutely fishy about any of this.

We're curious if Snowball Simpson voted this week.
Bob Terwilliger voter, Snowball, hangs out in heaven, waiting for more crooked elections.
We appreciate the outpouring of support this week, all in the name of good fun. This has our most exciting race to date, and not just because we've had seven times the number of voters more than our previous record.

This week, we have to say goodbye to Bartlet, who has done wonders for attracting voters; even if they did only show up when he was fighting. In our 59 weeks of fights so far, we've had a total of 3,142 votes. In the four weeks Bartlet was up, we've had a total of 1,684 votes. Just as comparison, the four weeks Jack Ryan fought brought in 127 votes. Since those four Bartlet weeks account for more than half of our votes, we thought we'd have one of our co-bloggers offer some final words for Bartlet.
Doug: Bartlet was truly amazing to watch in The West Wing. He was tenacious, strong-willed and highly intelligent. If this had been a contest on who would win in a debate or a popularity contest, Tony and I probably wouldn't have gone through the trouble of creating a bracket of 64 presidents. We'd probably have just said, "No doubt, Bartlet's the best," and the discussion wouldn't have gone beyond that afternoon in Dec. 2010. 
But no, it was actually a question of who would win in a physical fight. We wanted people to consider physical strength, build, age, health and wits. While Bartlet has oodles of the latter, that's pretty much all he's got going for him. He wouldn't be the weakest fighter in the pool, but he's not exactly the complete package either. 
In the Round of 16, I knew Franklin Pierce didn't stand a chance. He was up against Bartlet, who had somehow beat Lyndon B. Johnson with 81% of the vote (which is just absurd, but whatever). I suspected that Bartlet supporters were sent to our blog to vote without even considering what was being asked, so I thought I'd goad Bartlet supporters into commenting and explain their reasoning. Maybe if they could answer for this, even in a fun way, I'd be better with this. Maybe I didn't know about one scene of one episode where Josh, C.J. and Toby were sitting around and agreeing with the idea that if Bartlet were to fight all of the U.S. Presidents, he'd win. If that were the case, then it was in The West Wing canon. I'd have to accept it. 
The answers I did get didn't really make me feel better.
Wait, so you voted for Bartlet because Pierce supported the Confederacy? Is the argument here that supporting the Confederacy automatically makes one a weaker fighter? That's, at best, specious reasoning. That's like saying that Federalists were better singers or that people who are pro-choice are automatically better at cribbage. 
So, either Bartlet supporters couldn't be bothered to read what our blog was about before voting, or they just didn't care and voted for Bartlet anyway. The irony in this astounded me, given that The West Wing was one of the most intelligent shows in television history. Maybe next, we should create a blog called "Who Sucks?" and laugh when Bartlet wins in a landslide against some universally despised president. 
Bartlet supporters could have been much smarter in finagling their guy to victory by planning ahead. By only showing up on Bartlet weeks, they were making their intentions and their blatant disregard for the question at hand obvious. 
For example: Bartlet got 81% against LBJ in the 2nd Round. That seems a bit unbelievable. LBJ was a big, angry guy. True he had health issues, but so did Bartlet. Bartlet's advantage could have been that he was clear-headed. I could have accepted it if he won with under 60% of the vote, but 81%? No, that raises some red flags.  
What would have been even better? Not just voting in Bartlet weeks, but also influencing who Bartlet met in later rounds. Bartlet getting 81% against LBJ is unbelievable. But what if LBJ narrowly lost in the 1st Round? Then we'd have a Bartlet going up against Chester A. Arthur in the 2nd Round. That sounds like a much more reasonable win for Bartlet. 
Either way, it looks like some of our other readers got sick of this and recruited some help to put an end to these shenanigans; possibly by employing some tomfloolery of their own. And to that, I say, "It's about freakin' time." 
Of course, I'm doubt that most of you are even reading this, so whatever.
The Chief: Thank you, Doug. I hope you're not the one who gives my eulogy.

The comments this week either support some part of Doug's tirade, or prove its veracity.
However, we're going to give this week's Eisenhower Memorial Comment of the Week to this person who captures the spirit (and the point) of HttCttD.

Obama goes on to the Rushmore Four where he waits to find out who he'll be fighting in his Semifinal match scheduled for March 26. Join us next week for our last Quarterfinal match, when Theodore Roosevelt fights John F. Kennedy.

Monday, March 5, 2012

Obama vs. Bartlet

As always:
We here at Hail to the Chief... to the Death intend that this blog be for entertainment
and wise-ass only purposes. We do not condone, nor do we encourage, violence
against any president: former or current, living or dead, real or fictional.

Barack Obama
44th President of the United States
Serving: 2009-Present
Age in office: 47-49

Arena Experience:
1st Round: 90.48% of 21 votes against Andrew Johnson.
2nd Round: 76.47% of 17 votes against Thomas "Tug" Benson.
3rd Round: 76.19% of 21 votes against David Palmer.

PROS: Obama is one of the youngest and most physically fit in the entire bracket. He entered the presidential race knowing how how big of a challenge that would have been AND if he did win, how much of challenge inheriting the presidency in 2009 would be. He did it anyway, and the U.S. didn't tip over into Great Depression II territory. Point being, he's always up for a challenge and he beats the odds.

CONS: He thinks too much and he doesn't really show anger. Really? That's all we've got? No, I guess these are valid. Some other combatants are just walking balls of rage and that's working quite well for them.

Josiah "Jed" Bartlet
Portrayed by Martin Sheen in The West Wing
Age: Sheen was 58 when the show premiered, and 66 when it, along with his fictional presidency ended.

Arena Experience:
1st round: 88.7% of 97 votes against John Tyler.
2nd Round: 81% of 100 votes against LBJ.
3rd Round: 88.6% of 186 votes against Franklin Pierce

PROS: Has incredibly impressive intellectual heft on his side, with deep knowledge of a broad range of subjects. Remains incredibly popular despite not having added much to the political discourse in the better part of a decade.

CONS: Diagnosed with M.S., which most voters apparently haven't heard of, despite apparently being slavish fans of The West Wing.

Pre-fight Analysis
Tony: I mean, I don't really know what to say, any more. Bartlet's been one of the most consistently dominating competitors in the Arena, outclassing his opponents, seemingly without breaking a sweat. Despite the fact that his body has all the dependability of an [insert ethnicity you wish to slur] car, Bartlet's been battering, bullying, and bashing bastpast all comers. And you know what? Good for him.

However, I think if one was to make a Venn diagram of Bartlet supporters overlapping with Obama supporters, the result would look like a singularly oblong purple circle. Will Bartlet's supporters stick with him, or will they defect to the (relatively) new kid in town? I honestly have no idea. This should be fun.

Doug: Yeah, if we came up for taglines for each of the fights, this week's would be "Obama vs. Bartlet: Suck it, liberals; you have to vote against one of them."

I'm pretty sure Bartlet supporters would vote for him even if he was up against a 20-foot tall Theodore Roosevelt.
Granted, the big stick wouldn't be allowed in the Arena, but he'd still be 20 feet tall.
And I guess that makes sense; Bartlet's smart and a great debater. He even cursed out God... in Latin! None of these have anything to do with athleticism or ability to fight, but that's all apparently beside the point in the Presidential Gladiatorial Arena.

The Chief: As always, voting closes Friday 9am Mountain Time. The winner moves on to the Rushmore Four.

Obama vs. Bartlet

Friday, February 3, 2012

There's Nothing Left But To Get Drunk

Yep, another win for Jed Bartlet. We hope he's not getting too big for his britches and making cocky moves like lighting up a cigarette in the National Cathedral.
Oh... well, I'm sure he's got the votes to back that sort of thing up.

Pierce vs. Bartlet
Franklin Pierce       21 (11.3%)
Josiah "Jed" Bartlet     165 (88.7%)

Another Bartlet week and another explosion of votes the first few hours followed by the normal trickle of votes the rest of the week.
Almost 300 hits in just one hour and over 700 hits on Monday. To put that in perspective, we had over 3,000 hits for the entire month of January.
Our readers bring up one of the main schisms we've encountered thus far, namely, how upset should we be when our silly blog yields a silly result? I mean, let's face it: this blog is silly. It's a presidential death tournament where the vast majority of the contenders are either already dead, or completely fictional. That's patently ridiculous. Yet, we here at the HttCttD home office take it rather seriously, and normally everything's fine, but then a Bartlet week rolls around, and things go plaid.

It's not that we dislike Bartlet (quite the opposite). In fact, Bartlet could have possibly made it to the quarterfinals, even without his droves of supporters who come by only when Bartlet's around -- though some of us believe LBJ would have presented quite the challenge. It's the fact that votes spike on his weeks and the fact that he's gotten 80-90 percent each time. Seems fishy, guys.

Hey, maybe we're wrong. Maybe we've picked up some fans as a result of people checking us out this week. If so, great! Welcome!

But, sadly, we most likely won't see a majority of these voters (most of which aren't even reading this because there's no way to vote for Bartlet in a Friday post) until next time.

Bartlet will return March 5 when he meets Barack Obama in the quarterfinal match. Wait, Obama vs. Bartlet? Liberals, your reckoning has come! Er, ahem. Next week, Theodore Roosevelt takes on Abraham Lincoln.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Pierce vs. Bartlet

Franklin Pierce
14th President of the United States
Served: 1853-1857
Ages served: 48-52

Arena Experience: Pierce got rid of John Quincy Adams in the 1st Round with 64.7% of the vote. When he returned to the Arena, Pierce sent Gerald Ford home, earning 55.6% of the vote.

PROS: Pierce is battle-hardened and he keeps loose with lots and lots of alcohol. The result, someone with the fearlessness to march into Mexico City who is probably numb enough to not realize someone is hitting him until the next day. That's a deadly combination.

CONS: He didn't have much in they ways of good ideas. Oh sure, the Kansas-Nebraska Act sounded like a good idea on paper, but it ended up ripping open the already festering wound that was the tensions between the states. Let's hope he keeps his bad ideas to a minimum in the Arena.

Josiah "Jed" Bartlet
Portrayed by Martin Sheen in The West Wing
Age: Sheen was 58 when the show premiered, and 66 when the show, along with his fictional presidency, concluded.

Arena Experience: Met John Tyler in the first round, and flattened His Accidency with 88% of the vote. Then faced LBJ in the second round, and did only marginally worse, with 81% of the vote.

PROS: Bartlet may have the most impressive résumé, intellect-wise, out of everyone this side of Thomas Jefferson, and his knowledge base covers quite a lot of terrain. Also, he's got quite the support base online.

CONS: Can be arrogant and overconfident at times, which we keep insisting is dangerous despite the results of Bartlet's arena encounters thus far. Also has M.S. According to Wikipedia, a person with MS can suffer almost any neurological symptom or sign, including changes in sensation such as loss of sensitivity or tingling, pricking or numbness, muscle weakness, or difficulty in moving; difficulties with coordination and balance; problems in speech or swallowing, visual problems, fatigue, or chronic pain, and bladder and bowel difficulties." And that strikes us as bad, you know?

Pre-game Analysis
Doug: I could put a lot of thought into how I believe an actual fight between these two people would actually go down, but I have a feeling a vast majority of the people voting this week won’t even read it. Scroll down, click on Bartlet, see ya at the next round, bye! What makes me say that?

Bartlet has earned a total of 167 votes in his first two fights, which is far more than any other combatant in the entire tournament. Granted, it’s not comments that get people to the next round, it’s votes. But comments let us know that people are actually reading what we have to say and coming up with their own thoughts. If people were actually putting thought into voting for Bartlet, I’d imagine we’d have a lot more comments for him. Yet, we’ve only had two. So either people aren’t reading, or they don’t have their own thoughts.

As it stands now, Bartlet has amassed fewer total comments than multiple fighters who lost in the 1st Round. One of those guys doesn’t even have a name. He has no name, but he got more comments with his eight votes than Bartlet got with his 167 votes.

I realize my explanation as to why I didn’t bother going into who I think would win this thing is longer than what would have been my explanation of who I think would win this thing. It probably doesn’t matter, because you’re most likely scrolling past all of this anyway.

Tony: I can't necessarily disagree with anything you're talking about, there. If only there was some way of grabbing the attention of the people who are merely scrolling through this thing? Hmmm...














STOP SCROLLING DOWN, JERKS!













NO, SERIOUSLY, STOP THAT.














I MEAN, UNLESS YOU'VE READ THE REST OF THE POST.













THEN YOU'RE FINE.















Okay, that got the message across? I hope so!

The Chief: ...

Tony: What?

The Chief: I don't even know what to do with the two of you.

Doug: Hey, don't lump me in with him! I didn't fill the post up by hitting Return!

The Chief: Did you try and stop him?

Doug: We're in different states!

Tony: Besides, him? Stop me? Pfft.

The Chief: Okay, shut up, both of you! Readers, as always, you have until 9am MST on Friday to cast your votes. We'll be back on Wednesday; hopefully these two [redacted]s will be better behaved then.

Pierce vs. Bartlet

Friday, November 25, 2011

"In Case You Were Wondering, 'Boy, the Great Society, I Don't Know,' Is When I Decided to Kick Your Ass"

Jed Bartlet wasn't born wanting to do this.
But, you know, sometimes you find yourself in an Arena, forced to fight other presidents to the death. Bartlet did what he had to do; he got rid of LBJ.
Bartlet vs. Johnson
Josiah "Jed" Bartlet      81 (81.0%)
Lyndon B. Johnson 19 (19.0%)
Once again, Bartlet supporters came out in support of the West Wing president. Most of those votes showed up on Monday, and after the initial surge, votes for LBJ came in at a nearly 1:1 ratio to the Bartlet votes. Unfortunately, for LBJ, Bartlet was up 60 votes by then. To top it off, we happened to get an even 100 votes this week, which made figuring out the percentages pretty easy.

While the votes were overwhelmingly in favor for Bartlet, the commentariat was split down the middle.
And we have to say that the pro-LBJ comment had a bit more... we hesitate to use the word "flavor," but something like that. There was also a slight concern that if Miss Litella's comment wasn't chosen this week, she'd just call us a bitch under her breath.

Bartlet is scheduled to return to the Arena Jan. 30 when he takes on Franklin Pierce in the Round of 16. Be sure to check in with us next week when Theodore Roosevelt meets Chris Rock's Mays Gilliam from Head of State.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Bartlet vs. Johnson


Josiah "Jed" Bartlet
Portrayed by Martin Sheen in The West Wing
Age: Sheen was 58 when the show premiered, and 66 when the show, along with his fictional presidency, concluded.

Arena Experience: Bartlet met John Tyler in the first round, and the results? Weren't pretty. Bartlet steamrolled his way into Round 2, picking up 88.7% of the vote.

PROS: Bartlet has a Nobel Prize (for Economics!) on his résumé, which isn't too shabby. And he probably knows more about the Bible than any five evangelicals combined. And while we're usually loathe to go meta around here, Bartlet has quite the following on Twitter, and when he's involved in online polls, those guys tend to show up in droves.

CONS: Bartlet is often accused (and rightly so) of being too arrogant for his own shoes, and getting overconfident in the Arena is usually bad times. ALSO, there's the little thing that Bartlet has MS, which he hid from the public, and even his own staff, when he first ran for president. So depending on when Bartlet gets dumped into the Arena, he might be unable to move, or he would only be able to walk using braces and crutches. Could be a problem.

Lyndon B. Johnson
36th President of the United States
Served: 1963-1969
Ages during term: 55-60

Arena Experience: LBJ met Chester A. Arthur in the 1st Round and gave him a sound beating, winning with 80.6% of the vote.

PROS: If someone disagreed with Johnson, they got "The Treatment." It's when he literally got into someone's face spouting accusations, cajolery and mimicry until his opponents were stunned into submission. He used this technique to push through the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He wasn't all talk, either. He "stared down" the Soviet Union during the Six Day War and ramped up our military involvement in the Vietnam War.

CONS: LBJ's heart wasn't really in the best condition. He had suffered a heart attack while he was in the Senate. Though he gave up smoking in an effort to improve his health, he did have to worry about heart disease. His military record was also... interesting, to say the least. He was awarded a Silver Star, despite the fact that he never saw combat. There was one instance where he said he came under enemy fire, but everyone else on the plane he was on said they turned around due to mechanical problems. Fishy.

The Fight
Doug: I have a feeling that this vote isn't going to come down to who is the ornery, intimidating Southerner with a further reach and who sometimes suffers bouts of temporary paralysis. It's going to come down to who was in the popular television show and who was not.

If only LBJ got himself a Rachel hairdo. If only he was the one who shot C. Montgomery Burns. If only he ended one of his presidential addresses with the catchphrase "DYN-O-MITE," then maybe, the angry guy who escalated the Vietnam War and stood at 6'4" would have a chance against the 5'7" bookworm.
If he were a teenage president and not a teenage doctor,
he could have easily cleaned up.

Granted, Bartlet once earned the Nobel Prize for Fistfighting, so that gives him a strong advant -- I'm sorry, I read that wrong. He has the Nobel Prize for Economics.

Never mind.

Tony: Thing is, it's not like Bartlet hasn't waded through the remains of opponent after opponent. Every time someone steps to him, they're smacked down. Yeah, I'm being metaphorical, as Bartlet didn't physically defeat his Republican opponents in the 1998 and 2002 elections, but still, he's not afraid to bring the heat when it's necessary. Just ask the Qumari Defense Minister.

Johnson may have been intimidating in person, but that'll only get you so far. For example, he couldn't intimidate the country into thinking the Vietnam war was still a good idea in 1968. And since he couldn't do that, he quit. He's a quitter.

Bartlet's not the type of guy who would give in to a bully. Johnson's going to bluster his away around the Arena, turn around, and realize he's not making any headway. Then, he's going to pout his way into a second round loss.

Doug: It's not like the Vietnam War was the first thing he tried to push for and it failed so he gave up. He didn't give up on the idea that maybe blacks and whites should be able to use the same water fountains and attend the same public schools. Sadly, for our disgustingly ugly history, that was a much tougher fight than it should have been. It was risky, too. He knew that when he signed it, he was losing the South. He did it anyway, and he easily took the Election of 1964.
He didn't really need the South, anyway.

I'm not questioning Bartlet's tenacity. Clearly, he has plenty of it. And he may not crumble to LBJ's bullying as easily as LBJ is used to. Truth is, anyone who would make it a habit to bully someone into seeing things his way has got to be a mean old bastard. So when the normal stuff doesn't work, LBJ is going to pick Bartlet up by the ears like he was one of his beagles.
It almost looks like he's going to make Him dance.

Tony: Oh, he won't do anything of the sort. We already know what happens when LBJ can't bully his way into something; he goes into Sulk Central. And the pool of people unable to be bullied by LBJ is surprisingly large, as this is a guy who couldn't talk himself past a group of peeved housewives! Okay, granted what I'm talking about comes from The Right Stuff, which means it was when he was Vice President, and granted, The Right Stuff wasn't exactly a documentary, but it was based on real events, so I'm pretty sure it's legit. Okay, it was based on a book that was based on real events. WHATEVER.

Meanwhile, Bartlet is just waiting to pounce on some overconfident Texan. He's never seen an opponent he doesn't know how to handle (I could watch that clip of him taking down the puissant Dr. Laura stand in on a loop for a full week), and LBJ is going to find that out the hard way.

Doug: Yes, but this isn't a contest to see who can talk their way past a group of housewives or a fake Dr. Laura. We're trying to see who could pummel the other person into oblivion. While both guys have enough fire in them to get pumped up for a good fight, only LBJ has the physical might to back it up.

Despite his character's portrayal in the thing based on the thing based on real events, we're going to see that LBJ does, in fact, have the right stuff. (I'd link to the NKOTB video, but no one wants that.)

Tony: Ah, but the Arena isn't simply a matter of physical prowess. You need to be smart in able to concoct a winning strategy, and to react to overcome any obstacles that get thrown in your way. You've got to have the resolve to plow through adversity. And, most importantly, you've got to have… Faith.

Ha! No, just kidding. You have to have the power to motivate your voting base. And Bartlet?


Yeah, he's got that.

The Chief: Indeed. The polls are now open! They will close Friday morning at 9am, Mountain time. Between now and then, you should vote, and then explain why you voted for your combatant of choice via a comment. We'll be back on Wednesday with more general tomfoolery.

Bartlet vs. Johnson

Friday, July 1, 2011

Let Bartlet Be Bartlet... Or Else

Just like the presidential elections of 1998 and 2002 (wait, what?) the voting public gave a Bartlet a resounding victory.
If we didn't know any better, we'd say that a lot of our voters visited us specifically to vote for Bartlet.

Bartlet vs. Tyler

Josiah "Jed" Bartlet      86 (88.7%)
John Tyler 11 (11.3%) 

Actually, we feel comfortable jumping to conclusions and saying that's exactly what happened. It's not like these Bartletbaggers were sneaky about their intentions. We had quite the dramatic spike in the first two hours after the Monday's post went up.
Another look at the Bartlet Effect, 2-hour spike followed by 94 hours of relative silence.

To clarify, the term "Bartletbaggers" is not to play on the term "tea baggers." That wouldn't actually make sense. It's our attempt at being cute and working off the of the term "carpetbaggers" — Northerners who moved to the South during Reconstruction to take advantage of the political situation down there. In this case, a Bartletbagger visits our site the week Bartlet is up and votes for him — implying an able-bodied man in his 50s has absolutely no chance against a slightly older man with some significant health issues — and then disappears.

Our message to Bartletbaggers: We hope you pay us a visit again before Bartlet's next match. There are 40 non-Bartlet combatants still alive in this thing who would appreciate your loyalty. If you were half as spiteful as us, you would vote every week just to prove us wrong.

Bartlet was able to get the most votes of any combatant so far, though this week's fight fell 20 votes short of tying our record for most votes in a week (Whitmore vs. Garfield — 117).

Onto Comment of the Week business:
We caught some criticism for listing Tyler's fertility as a con, making the point that raising a lot of children would take a lot out of a guy. Though, it was also pointed out that having that many kids would give a father a near-superhuman ability for conflict resolution and breaking up fights. I would hazard to guess that Tyler's slaves were usually in charge of making sure the kids behaved, which kind of nullifies the argument for pro and con.

The image of Tyler raising a polo match, however, is silly enough for us to like. Why would they allow all of those horses to run around their house?

We also enjoyed the idea of Bartlet hitting Tyler with a bike, but it goes against the rules of the Arena.

We'll see Bartlet again in the 2nd Round Nov. 21. Next week, we have our final 1st Round fight of the Marshall Bracket when Lyndon B. Johnson takes on Chester A. Arthur — two vice presidents who succeeded assassinated presidents, but only one will succeed in the 1st Round.

Monday, June 27, 2011

Bartlet vs. Tyler


Josiah "Jed" Bartlet
Portrayed by Martin Sheen in The West Wing
Age: Sheen was 58 when the show premiered, and 66 when the show, along with his fictional presidency, concluded.

PROS: The (Almost) Complete Package — So, in Bartlet, you have someone with a pretty damn solid résumé. After scoring a 1590 on his SAT's young Bartlet decided to attend Notre Dame in the hopes of becoming a priest. These plans changed when he met his future wife, and though he dropped any further thoughts of the priesthood, he remained a devout Catholic for the rest of his days. Well, aside from that time he got really pissed at God and cursed Him out in Latin, but we won't get into that, much.

After graduating, Bartlet became an economist, and he turned out to be pretty darn good at it, as he eventually earned himself a Nobel Prize in that particular field. But Bartlet believed that he had a duty to help make life better for the less-fortunate, and being the old school Liberal he was, the only place he knew how to make that happen was: politics. He served three terms in the New Hampshire state House, then three terms in the United States House, then two terms as Governor of New Hampshire. It was at this last stop that an old friend, Leo McGarry, came to see him. Leo wrote down a little something on a napkin:
"Bartlet for America"
You see, Leo recognized that Bartlet was the complete package. Someone with legislative and economic experience, the passion to make things better, and someone who was strong in areas typically latched onto by the conservative right. In short, he was a man who would stand up and say, "Hey, I think it would be neat if we reduced the cost of milk so that children get proper nutrition," then waltz into the next room and deliver a smack down like this:
I believe, as the kids say, she just got pwned.

Bartlet's made a career out of kicking ass and taking names for the greater good. Sure, none of that has been actual fighting, but he knows how to transfer knowledge between fields. He's got this.

Popular as all hell — We here at HttCttD try to pretend that our voters will base their votes on the arguments we make here, not on any preconceived notions of the combatants themselves. Occasionally... it's less-than-clear that they're doing that, but whatever.

However, we'd be remiss if we didn't point out that, even for a fictional character whose television show ended five years ago, Bartlet remains astoundingly popular. How popular? Let's pull a recent example, shall we? A couple weeks ago, a lone CNN reporter idly wondered on Twitter who, out of anyone in the world, her followers would like to see run for president:
It didn't take very long at all for Bartlet's name to come up:
Eagle-eyed readers will notice Bartlet was one of the retweeters on this message.
Bartlet's new candidacy took off very quickly:
A day later, the results were in!
While Desjardines never released any official numbers for the poll, it was clearly a Bartlet landslide. And you'll notice he defeated Reagan, both in live and zombie form! Zombie Reagan is crazy-popular! Yet, he fell to the fury from New Hampshire.

What we're saying is, in a contest whose outcome is determined by votes, Josiah Bartlet has the support to garner a lot of votes.

CONS: Arrogant — The number one complaint lodged against Bartlet and his administration was they they were, collectively, a bunch of smug, arrogant, know-it-all sons of bitches. And, let's face it, they kinda are. And that leads to... confrontations.

(Okay, brief setup for this next link: it's from the pilot episode of "West Wing," and all you really need to know is that a) Bradley Whitford's character managed to shoot his damn mouth off on a political talk show prior to the events seen here, and b) the Mary Marsh character, aka, the only woman on the Conservative side of the room, was the one who goaded him into it. Oh, also, she's something of a Ann Coulter analogue. Oh! And the day before, while on vacation, President Bartlet ran a bicycle into a tree.)

Anyway, go see what I'm talking about, here.

Everyone back? Cool. Now, it's obvious well before the President walks into the room that there's little love lost between those two sides. But Mary Marsh eventually puts her finger on the button:
They think they're so much smarter! They think it's smart talk, but nobody else does.
Of course, her people can't even get the Ten Commandments straight, so there's that. And it actually leads to a great entrance line for the President, so we'll allow it. Of course, this allows the President to show off, which, come to think of it, is something that he does in the other clip we posted, isn't it? It's not enough for him to show up a conservative radio host (and thin-veiled Dr. Laura stand-in), he has to rub her face in it. He needs everyone to know damn well that he's the smartest guy in the room.

Maybe his political opponents should remind him that the Bible says "Pride goeth before a fall." This would actually be a bad idea, because that's not in the Bible. However, we imagine Bartlet's heard it before.

To be fair, we should point out that the Republicans have a lot of dumbass moments in the series. When Bartlet comes up for re-election, and there's a fairly good chance to get him out of office (for reasons we're going to get to in a second), they run this guy:


Also, there's the whole MS thing — So the reason why Bartlet was so vulnerable when re-election time rolled around? Funny thing- he wasn't even supposed to run for a second term! Why? Because he made a promise to his wife that he wouldn't. And why did he do that? Because they both knew something: that Jed Bartlet had been diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
"Maybe we should tell somebody about this? Eh... nah."
Bartlet didn't even tell his best friend and Chief of Staff (the aforementioned Leo McGarry) until a year into his term. Granted, for most of his term, the disease itself wasn't a big deal. Sure, he did faint that one time preparing for his first State of the Union address, and sure, by the end of his term, he could barely walk (with or without crutches), and sure, the revelation that he had MS and lied about it led to a continuous rolling shitstorm for the latter half of his first term, but other than all that, it's not so bad, right?

Well, if there's one thing I wouldn't want to drag into a fight to the death, it's a debilitating physical condition.

John Tyler
10th President of the United States
Served: 1841-1845
Ages served: 51-54

PROS: He’s a loner, Dottie. A rebel — Tyler was the only former president to have been elected to the Confederate government. He had been elected to the Confederate House of Representatives, but he died before he was sworn into office. As a result, he is considered to be the only president to die in a foreign country — the distant land of Richmond, Va., which was actually not recognized by the U.S. government as a foreign country — and he remains the only president not to be officially mourned in Washington.

He did his own thing as president as well. Tyler was elected vice president, under William Henry Harrison, in 1840. Harrison is the guy who’s famous for dying a month after taking office. Tyler really wasn’t interested in being vice president. In fact, he peaced out of D.C. before the Congressional session even ended, and he didn’t return until after Harrison’s death.
"Shit, I have to go back to that swampy hell hole?"
When he returned, he decided that maybe the Whig platform wasn’t for him anymore, so he went against the party. The party didn’t really like that, so they kicked him out of the party.

Whatever, he didn’t care. He’s a loner, Dottie. A rebel. You don’t want to get mixed up with a guy like that.

He won’t take your nonsense — The Constitution wasn’t all that clear on what happens if the president dies. All it said was:

“In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President.”

Okay, the vice president assumes the duties. But what’s his title? Is he still vice president? Is he acting president? Tyler was like, “Aww, hell no. I’m stuck in Washington with you yo-yos, and I’ve got presidential duties. I’m the president.” I'm paraphrasing, of course.

Some prominent members of Congress weren’t necessarily down with this. This was mostly for their own selfish reasons — they were hoping to use this opportunity to wield some presidential powers without actually being elected. Tyler shut this nonsense down and told Sen. Henry Clay to get back to the Capitol and do his job so that he could do his job in the White House.
Clay got told.

Congress eventually passed a resolution declaring Tyler the 10th President of the United States, which set an important precedent. Regardless of this fact, some people still refused to refer to him as president. Any correspondence addressed to Vice President Tyler or Acting President Tyler was returned, unopened.




The guy’s firm, and is in no mood to put up with any bullshit.

CONS: Prolific father — Tyler and his first wife, Letitia, had 8 children. She died in 1842 — the first first lady to die in the White House. A couple of years later, Tyler married remarried, and together, they had seven children. The dude raised 15 children! That must be tiring.
"Whatever, amateur."

To put that in sitcom perspective, in terms of children, that’s 3 Huxtable families (excluding Olivia. I couldn’t stand that girl.) Or, that’s the Bradford Family (Eight is Enough) plus the Lubbock Family (Just the Ten of Us), minus one. Let’s make it Willy Ames. Nothing personal, Mr. Ames, Zapped! was a wonderful film. You're just the only child from either family whose actor's name I recognize.

I can imagine a father of 15 children entering the ring and begging to be put out of his misery. Anything would be better than going home to that zoo.

Okay, granted, by the time Tyler was president, he hadn’t had any children with his second wife, so the number would stand at eight, but we know he has the ability to make at least 15. No disrespect to Tyler, but I wonder how long someone capable of fathering 15 children can go without humping something. I hope it’s longer than the duration of your typical fight in the Presidential Gladiatorial Arena, because things might get messy and/or awkward.

Nickname says it all — People who were not in favor of Tyler being given the title of president bestowed a nickname upon him: “His Accidency.” Their opinion was that Tyler wasn’t brought to the White House by the will of the electorate, but by complete accident.

It actually wasn’t the first time his political career advanced due to someone's death. He was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1816 to fill the position of John Clopton who had died earlier that year. It actually thrusted Tyler into the national political scene.

Granted, he was elected that time, but only because Clopton died. Who knows how long Clopton would have gone on serving had Death’s icy grip not, ya know, killed him? Tyler just doesn’t advance unless someone dies. Granted, that’s the purpose here, but take a look at his presidency. Someone died, he became president. He couldn’t get re-elected on his own.

He’s in the Presidential Gladiatorial Arena™ because Harrison died, but there’s no reason to believe he can advance on his own.

The Fight
Tony: Listen, if there's one thing Bartlet does well, and I mean really well, it's righteous indignation. And if there's one thing that Bartlet respects almost above anything else, it's the sanctity of government, and the office of the Presidency. I guess that's two things. Whatever. The point is, if you throw him in the ring against a guy who disrespected the country by going off and joining the Confederacy? He's going to get angry. And I don't think Tyler is going to like him when he's angry.
Besides that, what does Tyler bring to the table, here? Oh, he didn't take any guff? Bully for him! Bartlet's going to wrap him up in guff like guff is aluminum foil, and Tyler's a stick of gum. And then Bartlet is going to transform that guff into ass whoopage. Q.E.D.

Doug: If this were a debate or an argument, Tyler wouldn't have a chance. No one going up against a Sorkin-scribed protagonist has a chance. But this is all about Bartlet using his fists, and he doesn't have too much experience with that.

I will, however, point out in the earlier cited Mary Marsh scene, Bartlet makes it very clear that he does not have a very good record of acting with a clear mind while angry. If Tyler's rebel ways get Bartlet fired up enough for him to do something stupid, he should just keep the anger coming by telling Bartlet about how he owned slaves his entire life. That should make Bartlet slip up enough.

Then we'll see who's the aluminum foil and who is the stick of gum.

... Wait, why aluminum foil?
Tony: Look, I think we've got two dudes in the arena this week who lack a certain fighting skill set, so I think that's probably a wash. Therefore, it's going to be all about tactics, and Bartlet's got to have Tyler beat on that score. After all, Tyler's go-to move seems to be to flip out and go it alone. Well, he's already going to be alone when he gets dumped into the arena, so that go-to move will be gone. Advantage: Bartlet.

Oh, that seems like a winning strategy: get Bartlet fired up about civil rights. Seriously. Tyler might as well douse himself in gasoline and start waving matches around at that point.

The aluminum foil is the gum wrapper? You know? The wrapper on the gum?

Doug: I'm a little confused about your tactics here. You say Tyler is at a disadvantage because he likes to go it alone. How is that a disadvantage in the Arena, where you're expected to go it alone? It's not like he's going to have Leo McGarry there to offer words of encouragement, telling him that he can do it. So Bartlet is not with the advantage here.

And when I pointed out that Bartlet explained that he acts stupidly when he gets really angry (ex: taking out his garage door, riding his bike into a tree) and that Tyler could use this fact and get Bartlet angry, you make it sound like an angry Bartlet has what it takes to win and won't screw it up somehow.

Okay, I hear aluminum foil, and I think the stuff you wrap leftovers in. I guess some gum come wrapped in a kind of foil with paper. I'll give it to you, I suppose.
For the record, miniature Paul McCartneys are wrapped in paper.

Tony: I guess what I'm trying to say about Tyler is that he enjoys casting off his previous support system. First he's a Whig, then BOOM! He's out. First, he's part of the Union, then BOOM! He's out! It's like a basketball player's first step. Problem is, now he can't do that step, because there's no support system for him to shuck off. As a result, he's going to be discombobulated, and easy prey for pissed off New England Catholics.
You don't think Angry Bartlet has what it takes to win? Go watch that clip where he eviscerates the Dr. Laura stand-in, again. Okay, I'l grant that occasionally when he gets mad, bad things happen in the form of destroying garage doors or sudden arboreal stops. Other times? That happens. Tyler doesn't want any piece of that.

You wrap leftovers in aluminum foil? Saran wrap, Doug. Saran wrap.

Doug: Tyler doesn't need a support system. He spent nearly his entire presidency without a party. Did he go grovelling back when they kicked him out? No. Did he rush out and try to cozy up to another party? No. He doesn't need anyone. That's why he's perfect for the Arena; it's just him out there. This is what he does. He fights his fights all by himself.

Yes, I saw what he did to the Dr. Laura stand-in. He composed a very well-thought out argument that shut her up. That's pretty much all he does, and he does it very well. Bartlet's going to enter the ring and tell Tyler what he thinks about state's rights and the spread of slavery to the West. He's going to put Tyler in his place... verbally. This isn't a debate. You think Tyler cares about others thinking he's right? No, in fact Tyler will probably want to get down to business and start throwing punches just when Bartlet is feeling at his most smug and self-satisfied. And that won't be good news for the guy with the debilitating nerve disorder.

I don't use just aluminum foil. Only some leftovers get aluminum foil. You wrap hot food in Saran Wrap? That doesn't sound too healthy.

Tony: No, hot food goes in Tupperware, or whatever Tupperware knock-offs you happen to have handy.

Doug: Tupperware? Are you kidding me?

Tony: Well, what the hell else am I supposed to do with soup?

The Chief: Okay, kids. I think we can wrap this debate up. Polls close Friday at 9am MDT. Be sure to vote and comment.

Bartlet vs. Tyler